Sixth Circuit Court Rules Against FCC Authority to Enforce Net Neutrality
In a landmark decision on January 2, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have the authority to enforce net neutrality. This ruling marks a significant shift in the ongoing debate over Internet regulation, effectively nullifying federal mandates that would require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to treat all online content equally.
The Sixth Circuit, based in Cincinnati, Ohio, has appellate jurisdiction over federal district courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. This federal court, which was established under the Judiciary Act of 1891, has a long history of shaping significant legal precedents. Notably, former President and Chief Justice William Howard Taft once served on the Sixth Circuit, along with four other judges who later joined the Supreme Court.
The FCC, an independent agency founded by the Communications Act of 1934, oversees communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in the U.S. Despite its broad authority, the agency has faced challenges in regulating ISPs due to ambiguous classifications under the Communications Act. A core issue is whether ISPs should be regulated as Title l “information services” or Title ll “common carriers.”
In past decades, the FCC’s authority to impose net neutrality relied on Chevron deference — a legal principle allowing courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. However, the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo eliminated Chevron deference, creating uncertainty for agencies like the FCC.
Without Chevron deference, the Sixth Circuit found that the FCC lacks the authority to classify ISPs under Title ll, effectively stripping the agency of its power to enforce net neutrality. This means ISPs can now prioritize, slow, or block specific online content without violating federal law.
While federal net neutrality rules no longer exist, several states have implemented their own regulations. These measures aim to preserve open Internet principles, but they face potential legal challenges from ISPs and federal courts.
The ruling highlights the need for Congressional action to address outdated laws governing Internet regulation. As the FCC’s authority wanes, the debate over net neutrality will likely shift to state legislatures and the courts. The decision underscores the evolving landscape of Internet policy, with profound implications for consumers, businesses, and the digital economy.
What does America think?
